ANZSCO Match
Match your project with the duties linked to your nominated ICT occupation. Do not choose a project only because the title sounds technical.
Brain-dump your ICT projects, then run them through a 5-stage funnel — recency, ANZSCO alignment, complexity, your role and evidence — to lock in the two strongest projects for your RPL report and get a tailored writing blueprint for each.
List the projects from your work or study history. We check each one against ACS rules — dates, job match and technical depth — then show you the best two to write about in your RPL report.
Pick your nominated occupation, then add 2–6 projects. The more you add, the better the engine can compare and pick your strongest pair.
Your project descriptions are checked for keywords that match your occupation's duties. Always write in first person — "I built", "I designed" — phrases like "we" or "our team" will lower your score.
ACS rejects work that lacks engineering scope. Rate the depth of your eligible candidates — answers update each project's score live.
This tool is for guidance only — it is not an official ACS assessment. Scores are based on your own inputs. Only use real projects from your own work, education, or ICT experience in your ACS RPL report.
Each stage is a filter. A project has to survive all five to be recommended — the same logic ACS assessors apply when they read your RPL report.
One project must be completed within the last 3 years, another within the last 5 years. Older work is filtered out.
Your summary & tech stack are matched against the duties of your nominated occupation, with penalties for team-language.
Scale, architectural decisions and methodology determine whether the work shows real engineering depth.
How much you personally owned the work, and whether you can verify it with references or documentation.
The engine picks the two highest-scoring projects that satisfy recency and reward skill diversity across both.
Your project choice affects how clearly you can explain your ICT knowledge in an ACS RPL report. A weak project makes it harder to show technical depth, personal contribution, tools used, decisions made, and outcomes achieved.
Match your project with the duties linked to your nominated ICT occupation. Do not choose a project only because the title sounds technical.
Select projects that show real ICT tasks across systems, software, databases, networks, cloud, cyber security, data, support, or business technology.
Choose projects where you can explain your own contribution clearly. Show the work you completed, the decisions you made, and the problems you solved.
Use projects you can support with records. Evidence helps connect your project description with your real work experience.
Pick projects with a clear result — faster performance, reduced manual work, stronger security, better reporting, or quicker troubleshooting.
It works best for ICT professionals choosing real project examples before writing their RPL report — comparing qualifications, ANZSCO occupation, evidence, technical tasks, and personal contribution.
Choose projects that show how you applied ICT knowledge through real workplace tasks, connecting your work to the occupation you plan to nominate.
Pick topics that show how you used ICT tools, made technical decisions, solved problems, and delivered clear results aligned to your ANZSCO occupation.
Compare each project by technical tasks, evidence, personal contribution, and ANZSCO relevance, then keep only the strongest pair.
Choose projects that show configuration, fault diagnosis, issue resolution, or service improvement — not routine helpdesk tasks without technical decisions.
Many ACS RPL projects become weak when they fail to show clear ICT tasks, personal contribution, or supporting evidence. Review your project carefully before writing.
Do not choose a project that only lists general duties. Select work that shows technical tasks, tools, decisions, and outcomes.
Do not choose a project only because your job title sounds relevant. Match the project with the ICT work you actually performed.
Do not use a project that fails to support your nominated occupation. Keep your project, duties, and evidence aligned.
Do not focus only on the company or team. Explain what you personally analysed, designed, developed, configured, tested, or improved.
Do not rely on a project you cannot support. Choose work with documents, screenshots, testing records, references, or payment proof.
Do not copy project ideas or ready-made content. Use your own real project and explain your actual ICT contribution.
Check your selected ACS RPL project before writing your full report — project title, ANZSCO match, technical tasks, personal contribution, evidence, and report direction with expert guidance.
Get quick answers about ACS RPL project selection, project evidence, ANZSCO alignment, and report preparation.
CDRReportWriter.com is neither affiliated with nor endorsed by Engineers Australia.
See our guides first in Google Search.
Free Tools
Career Episode Structure
© 2026 CDR Report Writer - All rights reserved.
Vinni Roy
Text Us in Whatsapp
Vinni Roy
Hi there!
How can I help you?
WhatsApp Us
🟢 Online | Privacy policy
WhatsApp us